Regret, with no regrets

“Be sure you’re right, then go ahead”

Davy Crockett (maybe)

This quote was uttered by Fess Parker in his portrayal of the legendary Davy Crockett in the 1955 Disney film Davy Crockett: King of the Wild Frontier. While it is unknown if the actual Crockett spoke that mantra, it is nonetheless good advice. It is a maxim I have lived by my entire life, although not with the greatest of results. Simply put, sometimes I am wrong. Gravely wrong. And when I am made aware of my fallacy, I try to set pride aside and admit it. On the other hand, when I have searched the facts and my heart and sought the Holy Spirit’s guidance and confirm I was not wrong, I have no other choice but to affirm my stance or belief, until convinced otherwise. This article will address both sides of the coin.

Since 2015, I have been repeatedly called to account for my embrace of Southern heritage, namely, the Confederate battle flag and memorializing the soldiers who carried that banner. I became a member of the Sons of Confederate Veterans in 2016 and quickly became a leader in the organization. I championed the cause of heritage and history and have fiercely defended the Confederate soldier’s name and purpose. My interest in such things are much older than three-quarters of a decade though. I whetted my appetite for history over three decades ago as a schoolboy and had a burning desire to understand not only American history, but my family’s history. The more I researched, the more I uncovered about our involvement in every major American conflict and historical event stretching from colonial Virginia to the Republic of Texas. From the Atlantic to the Rio Grande, we had our hands in the dirt, building a home in the New World. My family bought land from and lived among the Creeks, Chickasaws, and Choctaws and some intermarried. With the exception of a few distant cousins or uncles, none of our success was won on the backs of slaves. Indeed, there is no generational wealth at all, let alone any that can be traced to the institution of slavery. We were all farmers, shopkeepers, and pioneers, but not slave-owners. However, when the southern states began to secede from the voluntary union that was known as these United States, the need for an army arose and across Texas, Arkansas, Mississippi, and Alabama, my kinfolk answered the call. Some died of disease, others served in the entire war, and yet others were discharged or deserted. All suffered immensely. We possess no written sources that describe why they enlisted. Was it for wanderlust, seeking adventure? Maybe it was a sense of duty that drove them to the recruiting stations. Perhaps it was guilt, not wanting to be ashamed for staying behind. Others could have been compelled, facing conscription or being treated as a traitor. Lastly, some may have been concerned that their way of life, coexisting with the “peculiar institution” of slavery was in jeopardy. I simply do not know why they fought and died for the Confederacy. Frankly, I do not lose sleep over it. Worse (according to my detractors), I ardently and affectionately honor my ancestors without shame. And this is what brings us to the mantra noted above.

Recently I was engaged on Twitter with an old friend whom I’ve known for over fifteen years. We’ve disagreed since the beginning about the Civil War and the Confederacy specifically. At one point, he told me “you are the only non-racist Confederate I’ve ever met,” a point I took as a compliment, but by surprise because I’ve known many like-minded southerners in my day. But as a black man, I’m sure his experiences have been much different than mine. Nonetheless, we’ve maintained a friendship over the years and I have been very forthcoming in my conversations with him about race and history, even asking him how I can better understand the struggle of black people in America, especially during the summer of George Floyd. Again, I was trying to search to see if I was wrong in how I viewed this conflict. However, during our most recent interaction, he sent me a tweet that showed me how misunderstood I am, or how I come across to others. Due to that tweet, I decided to write this short post.

I have been wrong. In the past, in my enthusiasm to defend the south and my ancestor’s names, I have dismissed their involvement in the perpetuation of slavery. As I’ve already noted, they did not participate in slavery, but did they enable it? One could say they did by their alliances with the Confederacy. Without getting deep into the sundry causes of the Civil War – and there are many causes for the war – an inexplicable fact is one of the reasons was to fight against the abolitionist Republican Party and it’s goal of ending slavery and expanding free soil all the way to the Pacific. Not every secession convention noted preservation of slavery as a cause, but most Democrats supported slavery, and most secession conventions were made up of Democrats. Interestingly, most southern apologists today insist that the states seceded over state’s rights and the adherence to the Constitution, and that is one hundred percent correct. The constitution in 1860 protected slavery and the interests of slaveholders. To force a state to abolish slavery would have been a violation of the Constitution, thus the invasion would have been unconstitutional and illegal. So while defending slavery was morally reprehensible, it was completely legal and every southern American knew that. Furthermore, if the Federal government or another state could compel a slave state to bend to their will, what else would they coerce them to do? Could Minnesota then force Alabama to vaccinate it’s population because of a “moral good?” The slope is very slippery. So rather than risk being run roughshod over in the halls of Congress, the southern states chose to create their own legal system that protected their own interests and defended by the might and blood of my ancestors. Right, wrong or indifferent.

I have been right. The average southern soldier had little to say about the opinions of the fire-breathers who called for secession and war, but overwhelmingly speak and write about fighting for home and family. In truth, many modern warriors have spoken of fighting for their brothers-in-arms, the men that are beside them in battle. Few veterans that I’ve spoken to had much to say about the politics that sent them to war, be it World War II, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan, or any other. When they do, it’s often with disdain. The politics surrounding the last several conflicts America has inserted itself in have been immoral, thus the cause was as well. This does not mean that we are sinning by showing respect to the men and women who carry our nation’s flag in battle. Indeed, many people who have criticized me for honoring my Confederate ancestors because they fought for a nation that institutionalized slavery have sworn to protect and uphold the Constitution of a nation that invades other sovereign nations and until very recently protected and legalized wholesale abortions to the tune of more than one million per year since 1973. During that time span, I have had many friends and family members who served in the Armed Forces. My great-grandfathers served in World War II during a time our nation imprisoned Japanese and German immigrants because of the language they spoke or their appearances. I continue to pay honor to them for their services, especially those who sacrificed so much in combat. They joined willingly because it seemed to be the right thing to do, not caring about the politics of the politicians, but wanting to serve their country and defend their family. Right, wrong or indifferent.

Bottom line is, chattel slavery such as was practised in Great Britain and the Americas was wrong. Anyone who supported it was wrong in doing so. Fighting against something that is wrong is always good, if it is done righteously. As the old adage says, two wrongs don’t make a right, so let’s be clear: the northern abolitionists who called for the death and pillaging of the south and it’s people were also very wrong. General Sherman said “War is hell,” and General Lee said “It is good that war is so terrible, lest we grow too fond of it.” Unfortunately for the people of the South, Sherman was much too fond of it and, with President Lincoln’s permission, unleashed upon the South hoards of soldiers who also were very fond of it. Ultimately though, I believe Almighty God is sovereign in all things, and it was His will that the South met defeat. Perhaps the Civil War was judgement on the nation for perpetuating slavery and other ills. Maybe it was because in His foreknowledge He knew the country needed to be united for future mutual benefit. Could be that there is still something to come that He knows can be best accomplished through circumstances that were only possible if the Confederacy was defeated. I don’t know the reasoning, but I trust His will. I also regret that slavery ever contaminated the land mass that my ancestors and I have called home for nearly four hundred years. Finally, I am grateful that the DNA of warriors and brave men and women exists within me today. Right wrong or indifferent.

A Christian’s Defense of Libertarianism

As I have evolved politically into libertarianism from a more conservative upbringing, I have encountered several arguments from people who I interact with as they attempt to dismiss the political philosophy that I have adopted. These would-be proselytes almost universally admit they agree with the small-government platform of the Libertarian Party, but there’s always one or two planks that prevent them from stepping away from the comfort of the party and ideology that they’ve embraced for years. I understand that way of thinking because I was there not too long ago as I embarked on my quest to discover my political identity. It was through much thought and soul-searching and some prayer that led me to the point I was able to leave my old party and join the more socially liberal Libertarian Party. I hope you will come away from this with a better understanding of how a Conservative Southern Christian is able to align with the Libertarian Party with a clear conscience.

To begin, I will quote the preamble to the LP Platform. The full text can be found at https://www.lp.org/platform/. 

“As Libertarians, we seek a world of liberty: a world in which all individuals are sovereign over their own lives and are not forced to sacrifice their values for the benefit of others.

We believe that respect for individual rights is the essential precondition for a free and prosperous world, that force and fraud must be banished from human relationships, and that only through freedom can peace and prosperity be realized.

Consequently, we defend each person’s right to engage in any activity that is peaceful and honest, and welcome the diversity that freedom brings. The world we seek to build is one where individuals are free to follow their own dreams in their own ways, without interference from government or any authoritarian power.”

Not too sinister, right? It reminds me of another document that is quite familiar:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

Thomas Jefferson was much more concise in his wording, but he basically said the same thing as the LP platform. The basic premise of the libertarian philosophy, as well as the party platform, mirrors the Declaration of Independence: that all people are by default granted with the right to exist as individuals and pursue their passions, ideas, and desires without interference from other individuals or their proxy, in this case, the government. It is on that foundational premise we delve into 4 planks of the LP platform that I have heard the most pushback on from the conservative Christian circles in which I almost exclusively exist.

  • Right out of the gate, Plank 1.1 states, “Individuals own their bodies and have rights over them that other individuals, groups, and governments may not violate. Individuals have the freedom and responsibility to decide what they knowingly and voluntarily consume, and what risks they accept to their own health, finances, safety, or life.”

This is the plank that comes the closest to the allegation that “Libertarians just want to legalize weed.” In a nutshell, yes, Libertarians want to legalize weed, but not because of the reasons that are commonly attributed to them. I am sure there are a great many that wish to partake in marijuana products in a manner that will not land them in jail, but the premise is much less self-serving. The platform itself says “individuals have the freedom and responsibility…” (emphasis mine) As I have already stated, I am a Christian (which does not entitle me to any special authority on the subject) and I have never consumed marijuana in any form, but I recognize the God-given freedom and responsibility to make choices that affect my body and my body alone. The right to do so is not and should not be given over to a body of elected officials. On the same token, it is just as preposterous for a city mayor to put a ban on Big Gulp sodas or large bags of potato chips. People do not need to be protected from themselves. As an aside, a common argument that is levied against legalization of weed is that DUI’s will skyrocket and there will be people out there driving and working while under the influence of marijuana. To that I say two things: first, there are already laws against operating machinery and vehicles while under the influence, and secondly, I have worked in the automotive service industry for the last 8 years and off and on for 15 years; if you saw/smelled how many people already smoke while driving while it is illegal, you would realize the law really is not a deterrent anyway. 

  • Plank 1.4 “Sexual orientation, preference, gender, or gender identity should have no impact on the government’s treatment of individuals, such as in current marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration, or military service laws. Government does not have the authority to define, promote, license, or restrict personal relationships, regardless of the number of participants. Consenting adults should be free to choose their own sexual practices and personal relationships. Until such time as the government stops its illegitimate practice of marriage licensing, such licenses must be granted to all consenting adults who apply.”

Gay marriage. This topic is one I have had to do a lot of consideration on. Believers of the Bible are familiar with how the Bible describes God’s handling of the practice of homosexuality. There is even a legal penalty for sodomy in today’s law code, and it gets its very name from the city that is most famous for its practice of it; the city of Sodom that God destroyed because of it, as described in the Book of Genesis. As a Christian, I am not a supporter of any movement that promotes the practice, but I can in good faith stand on the principle that it is not something that should be governed by a system of government that promises equal protection, and that protection encompasses life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. On a greater scale, however, the party platform maintains that government should not be an arbiter of the marriage contract, but that marriage should be a voluntary contract between consenting adults without permission from or regulation by the government. Until the government gets out of the business of regulating domestic partnerships, it is obligated to grant equal protection to all relationships. This also applies to polygamy, and I will not venture down the road of whether God approves of that form of relationship, but the Christian must also remember if God had placed the same restrictions on marriage that the American government does, many of the Biblical persons, including most of the heads of the 12 Tribes of Israel, would never have existed. Food for thought. 

  • Plank 1.5 “Recognizing that abortion is a sensitive issue, and that people can hold good-faith views on all sides, we believe that government should be kept out of the matter, leaving the question to each person for their conscientious consideration.”

I am not going to mount a defense of this plank. Abortion is a sensitive issue, as the LP recognizes, but that is where I part ways with the platform. My personal belief is that if there is even an ounce of possibility that life begins at the moment of conception, we have a sacred duty to defend and protect it. If science one day proves life does not actually begin until there is a heartbeat or some other physiological function, then maybe I can be persuaded to acquiesce, but until then, I wholly believe this is one of the few issues that the government does have an obligation to restrict, rather than regulate. Complete abolition of human abortion is the hill on which I personally stand, and there are quite a few in the Libertarian Party who share that stance with me. One solution to this divisive issue is to remove this plank from the party platform completely, a move that I would support because the existence of the plank drives away individuals who, like me, find it unacceptable, and therefore, unlike me, are unwilling to meet the party on the other areas of common ground. 

  • 2.10 “The Libertarian Party supports the decriminalization of prostitution. We assert the right of consenting adults to provide sexual services to clients for compensation, and the right of clients to purchase sexual services from consenting sex workers.”

This final issue is one that I personally have no definitive opinion on at the time of this writing. Sex work is a risky business for all parties involved, but unlike other dangerous occupations like building skyscrapers or whaling or coal mining, it is conducted for the sole purpose of pleasure in exchange for money and is often considered the oldest occupation on earth. I am not going to defend the practice of prostitution, but much like marriage, the government really overstepped its authority when it decided to criminalize it. Poor or desperate people should not be imprisoned because they chose to make a living off a vice rather than something “respectable.” There is an argument to be made for regulating sex work so that it is done safely and still criminalizes human trafficking and pimps, but this is not something I will explore in this essay. 

Christians, how many prostitutes, homosexuals, or adulteresses did Jesus turn over to the authorities for their sins? As I recall, He implored them to turn from their sin, but He did not look down on them or condemn them. Instead, He chastised those who condemned them. Think about it. 

Maybe I did not change any minds. If not, that is too bad, because I wholly believe if we Christians cannot embrace true liberty and freedom, we will be seen in history as those who stood in the way of freedom. Did our forefathers and mothers flee tyrants in the desire to worship how they saw fit only to have their descendants persecute those who do not operate under the same moral code as they do? Rather than throw the book at “sinners,” we should be imploring them to turn from their ways. This answers the question that was so popular two decades ago, What Would Jesus Do? By using the government as our enforcer, does it bring people closer to Christ or drive them away? 

Never forget, the power that we give government to enforce our will can be used against us when the seat of power changes hands. Haven’t we seen that happen more lately? It is time to reverse course and get the government out the way of more things. 

My belief in God will not allow me to solicit prostitutes or condone gay marriage or promote abortion and I do not ever intent to partake in drugs, but my conscience is clear in my stance and support of the only political party to say loud and clear: Keep the government out of our lives! Government has a place and a role, but it is not in our homes, bedrooms, or business practices, so long as we do not violate the rights of other individuals. That principle is the basic premise of freedom that we owe to our neighbors as well as the future generations. 

Grafted Into the Hebrew Root

All Scripture quotations are from the King James Version unless stated otherwise.

When I first began my journey into becoming Torah pursuant, I had never heard the term, Hebrew Roots, or the growing movement that uses that name (and as a point of clarification, I do not identify or associate with the Hebrew Roots movement). However, as I’ve plodded along The Way in seeking the will of Adonai regarding this change of focus, I learned the term carries with it a host of mixed ideas and connotations, and they range widely from odd but sincere to weird and harmful. Interestingly enough, so do the mainstream Christian denominations and sects. I should know, as I’ve grown up amongst them for the past 30 years. But this is not about them, per se, so I digress.

I do not identify or associate with the Hebrew Roots movement

I have heard from many Christians who boast (although they would argue against that term) that we are not bound by the Torah or Covenants because those were Jewish things and Jesus did away with those because of their unbelief. Furthermore, “I ain’t Jewish; I’m [insert anything except Jewish] so I’m free to do and eat whatever I want!” These people are severely lacking in one key factor: all believers have Hebrew roots.

The purpose of this study is not to delve in the Hebrew Roots Movement, but into the doctrine of Hebrew roots (lowercase “r”). For this purpose, we will be chiefly in Romans 11. The key verse that triggered this discussion between the Holy Spirit and I was verse seventeen.

And if some of the branches be broken off, and thou, being a wild olive tree, wert grafted in among them, and with them partakest of the root and fatness of the olive tree;

Hebrews 11:17

The process of grafting is quite fascinating. There are many methods, but for those unfamiliar, a person can cut off a branch of a tree, let’s say, an orange. At the severed end, a notch is cut in the wound. Then one takes a branch from another tree of a different variety and sharpens the end of the branch into a wedge. This end is then inserted into the notch of the first branch. The two joined branches are then bound tightly, usually with plastic wrap or some other tight seal and then left alone. Over time, nourished by the healthy root, the wound begins to heal and eventually the grafted-in branch becomes part of the main tree. If you chose a lemon branch, it will one day produce lemons although it’s host and nutrient supply is an orange tree. In reality, the lemon branch is just as much part of the orange tree as the orange branches. If the root dies, the branch dies with it. If it flourishes, so do the fruits. This is one of the ways man has learned to manipulate nature that is quite captivating to me. This interesting video shows this technique.

In Romans 11, Paul is using the method of grafting to describe what is taking place in his current time as well as in ours. He is writing to believers in Rome (c. 1, v. 7) and giving instruction and doctrine. Although some were Jews who believed (such as he was), many were Gentile believers. In fact, he explicitly states who he is writing to in our current chapter.

For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office:

Romans 11:13

To recap where we are; Romans is written to mostly Gentile believers living in Rome. This letter to them describes how they are considered to be grafted in as a wild olive branch into a cultivated olive tree. In short, Hebrews are pictured as the native, or cultivated olives and Gentiles (all non-Hebrews) are the wild, non-domesticated olives.

Going back to our opening verse, Adonai cut off the branches of the olive tree, but why? Why did he sever the limbs of the chosen domestic tree and graft in the wild ones?

Well; because of unbelief they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. Be not highminded, but fear: For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee.

V. 21-22

The branches – the Hebrew people – were broken off because of their unbelief. Their sin was not unbelief in Adonai, for they followed His Torah and knew who He is. Nay, their unbelief was in the Messiah. So in their place Adonai grafted in the wild olive, the wayward and feral nations who had before then never known the power and person of Yahweh.

Consider this: the only thing that separated the Hebrews from the Gentiles was the Torah. Torah (the law, the word of Elohim) existed before Moses, but was codified on Mt. Sinai and with it was a covenant promise. His promise and calling is without end (v. 29).

But the counsel of Adonai stands forever, his heart’s plans are for all generations.

Psalm 33:11, Complete Jewish Bible

We’ve already drawn the conclusion that every nation is pictured as an olive branch. The differentiation is between natural or wild. So we’re all olives. Ok. If Gentiles are wild, then the root of the wild tree could be deduced to non-adherence to Torah, since Torah is what set the Hebrews apart. Therefore, if the Hebrews are the branches of the natural olive tree, what is the root? You guessed it; Torah!

Some will argue that God, and not His law, is the root. That’s fine if one wants to argue that position. I insist that God and the Word of God are One. Isaiah made it clear that Messiah is the Branch, and John made it abundantly clear that Messiah is the Word.

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

John 1:1, 14

But a branch will emerge from the trunk of Yishai (Jesse), a shoot will grow from his roots. On that day the root of Yishai, which stands as a banner for the peoples – the Goyim (Gentiles) will seek him out, and the place where he rests will be glorious.

Isaiah 11:1, 10, CJB

The majority of Isaiah chapter eleven is a prophesy pertaining to the millennial reign of Jesus, but it’s very clear in the two passages above that it is a Messianic prophesy. Yeshua (Jesus) is the Word (John 1:1) and the Shoot (Branch) (Isaiah 11:1).

The Branch in Isaiah came out of the stem of Jesse. The stem came from the root. It is a picture of a lineal ancestry. We know that Jesus was a direct descendant of Jesse through his son, David. Jesse, like most Hebrews, was a descendant of Abraham. The Abrahamic Covenant, along with the Adamic, Noahic, and Mosaic Covenants, is part of the root of the natural olive. These were the foundations of the Hebrew people’s culture, identity, and religion. When Adonai gave Moses the Torah (instructions) on Mt. Sinai, He was giving the branches the instructions on how to fulfill the Will of the Root.

Furthermore, Jesus Himself said He was the true vine.

I am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman. Every branch in me that beareth not fruit he taketh away: and every branch that beareth fruit, he purgeth it, that it may bring forth more fruit.

John 15:1-2

Bringing it all back home to Romans 11, I remind the reader that the branches that were broken off were the Hebrews who did not believe that Yeshua was the Branch from Jesse. These are the ones who did not bear fruit because while they were rooted in Torah and the words of Adonai, they did not believe them from the roots up. The Jews did not recognize the true Vine, the one who bridged the gap between root and branch. So they rejected the vine.

The husbandman, The Father, did not pluck up the Hebrew root.

Any arborist, horticulturalist, and gardener knows if a branch of a plant is diseased or not producing, they must remove it in order to make room for the productive and healthy branches that will produce fruit. In the example of the olive trees in Romans 11, the branches that were dead or unproductive were removed to make room for a new strain of olive. The wild olive was cut away from its root and grafted into the natural olive’s root. It’s identity, sustenance, and growth now comes from drawing from its new, adopted root. The natural olive didn’t change at all, except to accept the grafted-in wild olive. Furthermore, the other olive branches have no say in the matter, for it is the husbandman, or gardener, who makes the cuts and modifications.

I don’t know if there could be any clearer picture of the adoption of Gentile into the Hebrew. The main root – the Covenants and Torah – has not changed. The husbandman, The Father, did not pluck up the Hebrew root. Nay, He simply pruned away the unfruitful, unbelieving Jews and left a remnant of those who believed. He then grafted, and continues to today, the Gentiles, who were the wild olives; sincere but pagan. These believing Gentiles then receive all the blessings of the Covenants, including salvation. Is their salvation in the root? No, not per se, for their salvation is in believing in the Vine, Jesus the Messiah. We Gentiles may not have a direct ancestry to Jesse (or Abraham), but we enjoy the blessings of the Vine because we are grafted into the Covenants through the grace of the Gardener.

How can we accept the Vine but reject the Root? Is that even possible? Paul has a warning for us Gentile branches that we would do well to pay attention to.

Boast not against the branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but the root thee. Thou wilt say then, The branches were broken off, that I might be grafted in.  Well; because of unbelief they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. Be not highminded, but fear:  For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee.

Romans 11:18-21

We should not let pride cause us to boast against the ethnic Jews, for we are just as susceptible to being pruned away. We were plucked from our pagan, unbelieving cultures (albeit several thousand years removed, for some) and grafted into the cultivated Hebrew root, not because of our own merits or superiority, but because the Father, Adonai, will not let His Word return void (Isaiah 55:11). His root is eternal, and He desires that we enjoy the fruits of it alongside, and equal to, the original branches that also believe. Shalom!

For there is no difference between the Jew  and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.

Romans 10:12

Who Will Save the Children?

If you are on social media, there is little chance you haven’t heard about human trafficking or seen the hashtag #SaveTheChildren in recent weeks. What I am writing about today is a culmination of several months of thought and prayer that has been circulating through me. I don’t know where this will go, but please read on to the end.

Pedophilia has been a plague for millenia. Even deeper than that, child sacrifice to various gods has existed probably since the beginning of time because evil has existed from the very beginning. I may lose some of you here because I’m going to wax religious a little, but hang on, because this issue should matter to everyone, no matter how religious you are or are not.

In the beginning, as Genesis tells us, the Almighty created the heavens and the earth. At some point before time began, He also created spirits who served Him: angels, to put it simply. According to the prophet Ezekiel, one of the chief angels, Lucifer, rebelled against God and was cast out from the heavenly realm along with his followers, roughly one third of all angels. This was the beginning of evil, which Lucifer, now called Satan, brought to earth and corrupted the Creator’s favorite creation, Man.

With evil now on earth, Satan rapidly began to challenge everything that the Almighty created that was good. Marriage, family, society, worship, and peace were all corrupted within the very first generation of humanity. In order to maintain control over man, Satan began to foment false religion in the minds of those who did not worship the Creator. Fear and power is what drove these new corrupted religions. Leaders used fear to feed their power and followers feared the power of the leaders. Some of the earliest religions that cropped up in the Mesopotamian region, known as the Cradle of Civilization, involved human sacrifice, and this included tossing children into pits of fire to appease the false gods, thus creating fear in the people and giving power to the religious leaders. While the gods themselves were not real, we can be sure the mastermind behind it, Satan, was well-pleased, but never appeased.

I’m going to step away from religion for a bit now because I want to fast-forward several thousand years and bring this discussion home. We’ve all heard about sexual abuse by clergy, teachers, babysitters, family members, etc. and it makes us angry. These cases seem a bit distant, like maybe they’re isolated or just perpetuated by a handful of perverted outliers. Recently, however, I’ve learned this atrocity goes much, much deeper than we…I…could ever have imagined. With the exposure of Pizzagate, Jeffery Epstein, and the coming forward of actors like Corey Feldman and Elijah Wood who are now adults but were abused as children in Hollywood the tip of the iceberg has begun to show. The pedophiles are now hiding in plain sight, as evidenced by the social media posts of several high-profile entertainers who practically flaunt their perverted crimes. There are disputable claims of Mel Gibson and Keanu Reeves coming forward exposing some of this, but the indisputable claims are boiling over until we are nearing a tipping point. It’s what I’m praying for.

A while back, I started to really dig into this topic. I don’t remember the first time I heard of it, but one day I just kind of “woke up” to the fact that this isn’t some conspiracy theory, but a very sinister reality. It’s more than sinister; it’s an abomination. Even then, I think that’s too soft of a word. Nevertheless, I started to read articles, watch videos, pay attention as whispers started to cross my ears. Then one evening, I stayed up late watching videos on YouTube about the use of adrenochrome and pedophila in Hollywood and among the elite in America. I had a hard time sleeping that night. This can’t be for real, I kept telling myself. There is no way this actually happens. The next morning, I went to work and put my nose to the grindstone, just trying to get my mind off of it and do my job. A customer came in that we had serviced a truck for in the past, but I hadn’t really gotten to know him. I began to gather information about the nature of his visit and we sat down in my office to write a repair order. He is a very outgoing guy and we settled into a discussion about politics or something. I really don’t remember. At some point, though, I brought up what had kept me up all night. I’m kind of a private guy, and I definitely don’t talk about things like this with complete strangers. Except I did. What happened next surprised me.

My customer, who we’ll call George, kind of dropped his eyes for a moment. When he looked at me, he was serious when he said, “You know I’m former military,” to which I nodded. I had seen the bumper sticker on his truck. “One of the companies I own does private contracting overseas. You’ve heard of the black market for human organs?” I replied in the affirmative. He continued, “We go after the doctors who harvest and sell those, mostly in Africa, but most of the customers are in North America and the Middle East. Wealthy, elite people, mostly Americans. We can’t take them out, but we can take out the providers. I can assure you everything you’re hearing is 100% true among American elites.” With that, the conversation was over.

I originally was going to list all of the instances where I’ve seen evidence of this. But I’ve decided to let you do the digging. A lot of it is unverifiable due to the nature of the coverup, so one has to use wisdom and discretion when determining what is legitimate and what is not. It’s for that reason I cannot in good faith tell you what is or is not true. But we need to follow the dots. When you start to understand what is going on, a lot of things start to make sense. Remember all of the conspiracy theories about the subliminal messages in Disney films? Doesn’t seem so unbelievable now, does it? Have you noticed the influx of pizza-themed clothing at big box retailers? Elementary children being forced to sit through drag queen story times?

Research the use of adrenochrome by actors, singers, politicians, wealthy elites. Keep a vomit pail nearby. Do it! Furthermore, research the connection between abortion, pedophila, pornography, and slavery. It is all part of one disgusting, abominable web.

According to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, more than 800,000 children go missing every year in the US. 99 percent of them return home alive, but for the 8,000 who do not, the reality is horrifying. Some are probably accidentally killed by wandering off into the woods or falling in a lake, but most are abducted and either sexually abused and murdered or sold into slavery. This is a staggering number.

What can we do about this? This is a question I’ve been begging for answers to. I’ve prayed, I’ve brainstormed, I’ve talked to others. I have no answers. But we have to do something. We can raise awareness. People HAVE to be talking about this so it doesn’t get swept under the rug. We have to be vigilant. Be aware of your surroundings and make your children your focal point of attention. Be engaged. Get involved with your foster care system, crisis pregnancy centers, women’s crisis help centers, and other organizations that help victims of human trafficking.

Watch the independent films “Operation Underground Railroad” and “A Child’s Voice” and the documentary “Out Of Shadows.” Furthermore, watch this YouTube speech to Congress by actor Ashton Kutcher at https://youtu.be/HUmfsvegMRo (from 3 years ago!) and check out his organization at www.Thorn.org where they have developed software to help law enforcement agencies locate abducted children and catch the predators.

Donate and volunteer with organizations like www.pathsaves.org who advocate for and serve victims of sexual exploitation.

Attend awareness campaigns and rallies. If there isn’t one in your area, organize one. We cannot let these monsters hide in the shadows any longer.

Above all…PRAY. Pray, pray, pray. I have begged God for mercy, but for His vengeance to be poured out upon these predators. The voices of every child (and adult survivor) who is or was abused or murdered, inside or out of the womb, has got to be deafening to their Creator. How long will He be patient?

Be a vessel for change! If you rallied for monuments or for Black Lives Matter or for women’s rights or any other social change but you are silent about this, shame on you! Where are the brave? Where are the good men? It is not enough to know about it, to hate it, to be disgusted about it. We have to actively fight this!

The average household spends almost $2,500 a year on entertainment. How much of that will you divert to helping spread the word and provide advocacy for these victims? Take the pledge with me! Use the hashtag #boycottpedos and refuse to spend your money on people who engage in this activity and those who refuse to make a stand against it.

Who is with me?

frazzledrip #pizzagate #SaveTheChildren #savethekids #chrissyteigen #ashtonkutcher #melgibson #keaunureeves #adrenochrome